WYSWHYMDYes, I did just make up a new acronym: what you see will help you make decisions. This is a blog post about how I researched and documented my findings on WYSIWYG (what you see is what you get) website editors and created a comparison chart using Cardsmith. Researching what online tools you should use is tedious. There seems to be a new app or website that would satisfy your needs released everyday. Of course, there are individuals and blogs that compare tools for you, but sometimes you want to DIY. How do you record your findings? In a Word document as a bullet point list? In a spreadsheet with columns and rows?How I Did ItI used Cardsmith and made a comparison chart. Specifically, I created a grid board where the columns were titled with features I needed, and the rows were specific WYSIWYG editors. Similar to what I would do in a spreadsheet, but with a little extra depth.The features I was looking for included must haves: the ability to add pages, ability to move sections around, add a gallery, integrate Google analytics; and one want: a way to easily use a custom sub-domain. Next, I created a card for each feature column that further described what I was looking for. Here’s the card I created for the feature: “Need: gallery”Here’s the extra depth I was talking about: using a checklist to detail the requirements I was looking for helped me stay focused during research and evaluate each editor to the same standards. During research, I was a lot more focused because I knew exactly what I was looking for. If a tool had both of the requirements, it was given a “good” rating. If it only had one, it got a “meh” rating. And if it didn’t meet any requirements, it was “bad”. And of course, each rating had a corresponding color.Here’s what the complete row looked like after fully researching the editor Wix:And here’s what the board looked like after I was exhausted from researching seven other editors. You’ll notice that the last column is all yellow. This is because I wasn’t completely sure what I was looking for, so I didn’t create any checklist requirements. The result? My research was less than stellar and everything ended up rated “meh”. However, most of those cards do hold links to helpful information.The white cards at the beginning of the rows also served more of a purpose than showing an editor’s name. They also held notes, links, and the monthly cost. Then by using grid totals, I was able to show the cost at the end of the row, providing even more information at a glance.There are two main reasons why I loved using Cardsmith to do my research.
It’s so visual. When I was done researching it was easy to see which editors met more of my needs, and how well they met them. When I was done, I rearranged the rows so the editors with the most green cards were at the top. Boom. The decision was practically made for me. (Remember: WYSWHYMD!)
Cards serve two purposes: hold information, and express that information at a glance. Yes, the board is easy to consume at a glance, but it also holds a wealth of information. As I did my research I was able to take notes not just on the editor in general, but about each feature, as well. This was great for storing links to things like FAQ answers or tips.
If you’re wondering what WYSIWYG editor you should use, feel free to use my board as a guide, but I recommend creating one that will be personalized for your specific needs.
How You Can Do It
Whether you’re comparing website editors, social media profile managers, or vacation spots, research is an important part of making a decision. But research doesn’t have to be hard, and your results don’t have to be in spreadsheets. I made this template to help you get started on your own comparison board.
Make sure you’re signed in if you want to copy the template to your boards.